On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the more important question is a policy question: do we want > it to work like this? It seems like a policy question that ought to > be left to the DBA, but we have no policy management framework for > DBAs to configure what they do or do not wish to allow. Still, if > we've decided it's OK to allow cancelling, I don't see any real reason > why this should be treated differently.
Is there a hypothetical DBA that doesn't want a mere-mortal user to be able to signal one of their own backends to do "cancel query, rollback the transaction, then close the socket"? If so, why? -- fdr -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
