On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think the problem is that the UPDATE or DELETE can only fire once a > matching row has been identified, so that OLD can be filled in > appropriately. But in this case, the matching row gets found not in > the parent table, but in one of its child tables. So any triggers on > the child table would fire, but triggers on the parent table will not. >
ah! and of course that makes a lot of sense... how embarrasing! :( -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers