On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Not true, please refer to code at line 544, as I already indicated. > > My understanding of the instrumentation is that the lock acquired at > line 526 will show as the blocker until we reach line 555, so anything > in between could be responsible for the wait.
Hm, but then wouldn't the lock acquisition at line 544 be showing up as well? -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
