Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I would say that's an improvement. Do you think it isn't?
>> It seems like a log spam hazard at high connection rates.
[ shrug... ] Failing to report a problem is a problem, too. By your
argument any error message anywhere should be removed because it might
be a "log spam hazard" at high reporting rates.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
