* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote: > I wonder if it wouldn't be better to pass a named pipe under windows and use > a > AF_UNIX socket everwhere else. Both should be pretty easily usable with the > existing code. PG already seems to use named pipes under windows, so...
I didn't think Tom's suggestion was really all that difficult to implement and sounds like a more-generally-useful change anyway (which you might want to use outside of this specific use case). Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature