* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote:
> I wonder if it wouldn't be better to pass a named pipe under windows and use 
> a 
> AF_UNIX socket everwhere else. Both should be pretty easily usable with the 
> existing code. PG already seems to use named pipes under windows, so...

I didn't think Tom's suggestion was really all that difficult to
implement and sounds like a more-generally-useful change anyway (which
you might want to use outside of this specific use case).

        Thanks,

                Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to