On 10 April 2012 23:07, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 04/10/2012 12:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I am doing more sophisticated things with it, so I'll celebrate this as my > opportunity to say I did something you didn't see coming for 2012.
This is why I requested that we expose the query_id hash value - I believe that it will be generally useful in clustering situations. It would be nice to have a persistent identifier. While we're discussing revising pg_stat_statement's interface, are you still opposed to exposing that value, Tom? -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
