On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 03:14:41 AM Robert Haas wrote: > > I'm somewhat oddly pleased at how the overflow of incoming submissions > > for 9.2 has raised questions around not having enough active committers. > > I hope decisions about adding more recognizes that distributing that > > power really does influence the ability of people to contribute, on > > average in a positive way. All I see coming for next year is a dramatic > > increase in this class of problem. > > My perception of what's going on here is dramatically different from > yours. I don't think there was any overflow of submissions for 9.2. > For the most part I would describe it as a slow and boring release > cycle, with the usual spike in half-baked submissions right near the > end, except this release they were less baked than usual, which is why > most of them didn't go in. They might have been half-baked. But several of those didn't get design-level review for several weeks which makes it rather hard to fully bake them in time...
Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
