On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Dunno. It might be easier to sell the idea of adding support for range > joins in a couple of years, after we've seen how much use ranges get. Once we've started the journey towards range types we must complete it reasonably quickly. Having partially implemented, unoptimised features is the same as not having the feature at all, so it will remain unused until it really works. We could say that about many features, but if Jeff is championing this, I'd say go for it. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
