On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:17:25 -0700, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > 1. We probably don't want the SQL syntax to be added to the > grammar. This should be written as an extension, using custom > functions as the API, instead of extra SQL syntax.
I can't find the discussion about this, have any pointer ? I've found a patch of 2007 by Gavin Sherry implementing the SQL 2003 TABLESAMPLE syntax. May be a good starting point ? http://www.neilconway.org/talks/hacking/ --strk; ,------o-. | __/ | Delivering high quality PostGIS 2.0 ! | / 2.0 | http://strk.keybit.net - http://vizzuality.com `-o------' -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
