Tom Lane wrote: >>> Um, that is what the proposed patch does. >> I was referring to the first two lines that the patch removes. >> I guess I don't understand why they should go.
> What we'd have left after the proposed removal is > > if (new_path->rows < old_path->rows) > remove_old = true; /* new dominates old */ > else > accept_new = false; /* old equals or > dominates new */ > > There's no need to make more than one test on the rows values. I see, thanks for explaining. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
