On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Jaime Casanova <ja...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: >>>> Tom Lane wrote: >>>>> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>>>>> Well, if we apply this, it has the possibility to break existing >>>>>> dumps. >>> >>> BTW, it occurs to me that we could dodge that objection, with much less >>> work than Robert suggests, if we just made the message be a WARNING not >>> an ERROR. I think that'd do just as well in terms of what the message >>> could usefully accomplish, ie, steer people away from doing things that >>> won't work. Still not sure that it's worth doing though, >>> >> >> i'm fine with a WARNING > > Me too; I suggested it before (so did you). >
are we going to put this warning in this release? -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
