Sorry for broken message. > >From I said that the former (spinlock) could be dropped, but the > latter (read as volatile) should be needed.
I said that the former (spinlock) could be dropped from the view of functionarity, but the latter (read as volatile) should be needed. > >From the view of maintenancibility (suspicious-proof > expression?), it may be preferable that the manner to read shared > memory be uniform whole source code if no particular reasons. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center == My e-mail address has been changed since Apr. 1, 2012. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
