"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes: > That "F0" class looks suspicious; are those really defined by standard or > did we encroach on standard naming space with PostgreSQL-specific > values?
I think we screwed up on that :-(. So we ought to renumber those
codes anyway. Perhaps use "PF" instead of "F0"?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
