On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > >> Is there a particular reason we don't have an ALTER DATABASE switch >> that controls the datallowconn, or is it just something "missed out"? > > I think it can be removed, or rather deprecated. > > datconnlimit can be set to 0
superusers bypass datconnlimit, but not datallowconn, don't they? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
