"Kevin Grittner" <[email protected]> writes:
> Would it make sense to use 08003 (connection_does_not_exist) when a
> broken connection for an idle process is discovered, and 08006
> (connection_failure) for the "in transaction" failure? What about a
> failure just after COMMIT and before successfully sending that
> result to the client? I notice there's a SQLSTATE 08007
> (transaction_resolution_unknown), but I don't know whether that
> makes sense on the server side, or just on the client side.
AFAICS, all the 08 class is meant to be issued by client-side code,
not the server. I think we probably have to use nonstandard SQLSTATEs
for these messages.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
