Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:39:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Actually, plpgsql is pretty expensive too. The thing to be benchmarking >> is applications of plain old built-in-C functions and operators.
> I thought part of the justification for this was for the OpenACS > guys; don't they write everything in TCL? Not relevant. The concern about increasing FUNC_MAX_ARGS is the overhead it might add to existing functions that don't need any more arguments. Worst case for that (percentagewise) will be small built-in functions, like say int4add. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html