On 05/11/2012 08:56 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:46:56PM -0700, Robert Haas wrote:
On May 10, 2012, at 4:19 PM, Andrew Dunstan<and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
On 05/10/2012 06:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
How about a hybrid: we continue to identify patch authors as now, that is with names
attached to the feature/bugfix descriptions, and then have a separate section "Other
Contributors" to recognize patch reviewers and other helpers?
works for me.
Me, too.
That does not work for me. There is no practical reason for a list of
names to appear in the release notes. I suggest if we want to do that
that we remove all names from the release notes (as Tom suggested), and
create a wiki for credit, and link to that from the release
announcement. That would allow us to put company names in there too.
I gave you a reason. You might not agree with it but saying that it's no
reason doesn't make it so. A wiki page will just be duplication, IMNSHO.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
