Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> Mind you, I think this whole area of the code needs some reengineering
> for better performance, but I'm not sure this is the right place to
> start. What I think is really bad is that we're forcing every
> BufferAlloc() to iterate over buffers checking whether each one is
> evictable.
Well, keep in mind that that action is not merely there to obtain a
victim buffer; it is also maintaining the global LRU state (by
decrementing the usage counts of buffers it passes over). I don't think
you can change it to simply look only at a predetermined freelist
without seriously compromising the overall quality of our buffer
replacement decisions.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
