> That's only true if you try to satisfy both goals at once, which I'm > not suggesting. So I believe that proposition to be false.
Oh, ok. Per your original email and follow-up arguments, you seemed to be doing just that. >> An alternative idea -- and one which could be deployed a lot faster -- >> is to come up with a tool which makes it easy to migrate an entire >> database into a separate schema or set of schemas in an existing >> database. And improvements to manage schema visility/path better, I >> suppose. > > Yes, it is possible to improve things there also. Feh, and nested schema, for that matter. So, there's a fair bit of work wherever we bite it off. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
