On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> Ummm ... stupid question, but can we even bring this into the 'core'? > >> > >> You may distribute under the terms of either the GNU General Public > >> License or the Artistic License, as specified in the Perl README file. > > > Artistic License is fine, I think. > > The Artistic License is cool, but it's not BSD. Are we going to drop > our recent agreement to try to move the distribution to all-BSD terms > so easily?
that's kinda what I'm wondering ... but, as someone else already asked also, is there a reason why we are even bringing this into the distirbution, vs, say, moving it to GBorg? I do like the ability for us to modify the code itself, but haven't put it into the repository yet since at least one person (or was it two?) questioned whether it should even be in there ... Personally, I'd love to put it into GBorg and have someone assigned as a maintainer for any patch submissions, or someone that wants to actively work on it ... ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
