On Thu, 31 May 2012, Robert Haas wrote:

Oh, ho.  So from this we can see that the problem is that we're
getting huge amounts of spinlock contention when pinning and unpinning
index pages.

It would be nice to have a self-contained reproducible test case for
this, so that we could experiment with it on other systems.

I have created it a few days ago:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-05/msg01143.php

It is still valid. And I'm using exactly it to test. The only thing to change is to create a two-col index and drop another index.
The scripts are precisely the ones I'm using now.

The problem is that in order to see a really big slowdown (10 times slower than a single thread) I've had to raise the buffers to 48g but it was slow for smaller shared buffer settings as well.

But I'm not sure how sensitive the test is to the hardware.

Cheers,
        S

*****************************************************
Sergey E. Koposov,  PhD, Research Associate
Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge Madingley road, CB3 0HA, Cambridge, UK Tel: +44-1223-337-551
Web: http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~koposov/

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to