Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We discussed this before and reached consensus not to use %m :)
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-01/msg01674.php
> :-) there goes my memory.
> That said, we're using %m in a fairly large number of places already,
> but they're mostly in the backend. I guess we're safe there.
It should only appear in elog/ereport calls; if there are any in bare
printfs, they are wrong, just as Fujii-san says. Frontend or backend
doesn't matter.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
