Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> Right now, you can't directly create a relation (table, index,
> composite type) in the pg_catalog schema, but you can create a
> non-relation (function, domain, etc.) in the pg_catalog schema.
Surely this is true only for superusers. Superusers can do whatever
they want anyway, no?
> Tabula raza, I'd argue for getting tough on this, and error out on any
> attempt to get a user-created SQL object into pg_catalog by any means,
> unless allow_system_table_mods is set.
allow_system_table_mods is mainly intended to prevent people from
altering the schemas of system catalogs, since it's more than likely
that the backend C code will fail (nastily) to cope with such changes.
I don't think it follows that we should prevent superusers from doing
things that are perfectly safe, like adding new functions in pg_catalog.
It's very likely that the specific restrictions enforced by
allow_system_table_mods could stand a fresh look, but I don't agree
with the idea of radically changing its charter. Nor do I think we
need to put training wheels on superusers for any changes that aren't
demonstrably likely to result in unrecoverable database corruption.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
