On tis, 2012-06-19 at 02:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > > On mån, 2012-06-18 at 17:57 -0400, James Cloos wrote: > >> I presume that lc_ctype is the significant difference? > > > It certainly makes some difference, but it's a bit shocking that > makes > > things that much slower. > > If James is testing text-comparison-heavy operations, it doesn't seem > shocking in the least. strcoll() in most non-C locales is a pig.
Ah yes, of course, having lc_ctype != C also selects strcoll instead of strcmp. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
