On 22 June 2012 01:04, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > This is nonsense. There are at least three buildfarm machines running > compilers that do not "pretend to be gcc" (at least, configure > recognizes them as not gcc) and are not MSVC either.
So those three don't have medium to high degrees of compatibility with GCC? > We ought to have more IMO, because software monocultures are dangerous. Of > those three, two pass the "quiet inline" test and one --- the newest of the > three > if I guess correctly --- does not. So it is not the case that > !USE_INLINE is dead code, even if you adopt the position that we don't > care about any compiler not represented in the buildfarm. I note that you said that it doesn't pass the "quiet inline" test, and not that it doesn't support inline functions. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
