Thomas Lockhart wrote: >>That's what I was thinking. In cases where you want to use the type for >>several functions, use CREATE TYPE. If you only need the type for one >>function, let the function creation process manage it for you. > > It would be nice then to have some mechanism for converting the > "automatic type" to a named type which could be used elsewhere. > Otherwise one would need to garbage collect the separate stuff later, > which would probably go into the "not so convenient" category of > features...
Well I think that could be handled with the new dependency tracking system. Same as the SERIAL/sequence analogy -- when you drop the function, the type would automatically and transparently also get dropped. Joe ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
