On 6/26/12 2:13 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of mar jun 26 15:49:59 -0400 2012: >>> Robert, all: >>> >>> Last I checked, we had a reasonably acceptable patch to use mostly Posix >>> Shared mem with a very small sysv ram partition. Is there anything >>> keeping this from going into 9.3? It would eliminate a major >>> configuration headache for our users. >> >> I don't think that patch was all that reasonable. It needed work, and >> in any case it needs a rebase because it was pretty old. > > Yep, agreed. > > I'd like to get this fixed too, but it hasn't made it up to the top of > my list of things to worry about.
Was there a post-AgentM version of the patch, which incorporated the small SySV RAM partition? I'm not finding it. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
