On 29.06.2012 18:28, Kevin Grittner wrote:
It would be nice if there was at least a thin layer of the sender
portion which could by used by a stand-alone program.  I can think
of lots of useful reasons to "T" the WAL stream -- passing through
the stream with little or no modification to at least one side.  As
just one example, I would like a program to write traditional WAL
files to match what an archive on the sending side would look like
while passing the stream through to an asynchronous hot standby.

That isn't really related to the logical replication stuff, but I agree that would be cool. You can sort of do that with cascading replication, but a thin stand-alone program would be nicer.

--
  Heikki Linnakangas
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to