On 29 June 2012 22:35, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > IOW I am not on board with reducing > the number of warnings in clang by increasing the number everywhere > else.
I successfully lobbied the Clang developers to remove some warnings that came from certain sites where we use a single element array at the end of a struct as pseudo flexible arrays (Clang tried to do compile-time bounds checking, with predictable results). Now, I had to make a nuisance of myself in order to get that result, but you might consider trying that. I have been using the Clang static analyser some. I've seen all those false positives. The greater problem is that the analyser apparently won't work across translation units. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
