On Monday, July 02, 2012 03:51:08 PM Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> 
wrote:
> >> Will do so. Not sure if I can finish it today though, I am in the midst
> >> of redoing the ilist and xlogreader patches. I guess tomorrow will
> >> suffice otherwise...
> > 
> > Ok, attached are two patches:
> > The first is the rebased version of the original patch with
> > WalSndWakeupProcess renamed to WalSndWakeupProcessRequests (seems
> > clearer).
> > 
> > The second changes WalSndWakeupRequest and WalSndWakeupProcessRequests
> > into macros as you requested before. I am not sure if its a good idea or
> > not.
> > 
> > Anything else?
> I committed these with just a bit of cleanup.  Sorry it took me a
> while to get back to this.  I did run some more tests but found no
> regressions.
Nothing to be sorry for. Looks good.

Thanks

Andres
-- 
 Andres Freund                     http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to