Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >>Any objection if I rework this function to meet SQL92 and fix the bug? > I don't object.
One more question on this: how can I generate some characters with > 1 encoding length? I need a way to test the work I'm doing, and I'm not quite sure how to test it. Just making a database that uses a MB encoding doesn't make 0-9/A-Z/a-z into characters of > 1 byte, does it? Sorry, but never having used MB encoding has left me a bit clueless on this ;-) Joe ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
