On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at> wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> Attached are two patches, one of which I'd like to apply. Open for >> discussion on which one. >> >> The smaller one, pgfoundry_1.diff, removes the suggestion to apply for >> new projects on pgfoundry. The reason for this being that pgfoundry >> doesn't *accept* new projects anymore. >> >> The second one removes the reference to pgfoundry completely. As a >> step in the deprecation. >> >> I'd prefer to apply the second one, but will settle for the first one >> if people object ;) > > Well, I don't object to the documentation change, but I have a problem > with the fact. > > Are there any other places that could be recommended for hosting > my pgFoundry projects? > If yes, that should be mentioned in the documentation.
Exiting pgfoundry projects are perfectly safe for now - but *new* projects are not accepted. There is a project underway (for a *long* time - it keeps getting stalled) working on migration paths. Until such paths are available and documented, existing projects will still be safe on pgfoundry. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
