On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Michael Glaesemann <g...@seespotcode.net>wrote:
> > On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:21, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > No they are not necessarily one logical unit. You could have a bunch of > > functions called, say, "equal" which have pretty much nothing to do with > > each other, since they refer to different types. > > > > +1 from me for putting one function definition per file. > > +1. It might make sense to include some sort of argument type information. > The function signature is > really its identifier. The function name is only part of it. > I'll go against the flow here. I would prefer to have all overloaded functions in the same file.
