On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote:
> I have code in the wild that defines new operators and casts and has no > C code and is not in an extension and has no business being in an > extension. Nobody is claiming that pgdump shouldn't dump it. But, since you're using operators, what would you think is an appropriate name for the file the operator is dumped into? a. -- Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god, ai...@highrise.ca command like a king, http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
