On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On sön, 2012-07-08 at 18:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: >> > On lör, 2012-07-07 at 17:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> >> Sure. You need not look further than "/" to find an operator name >> that >> >> absolutely *will* cause trouble if it's dumped into a filename >> >> literally. >> >> > But that problem applies to all object names. >> >> In principle, yes, but in practice it's far more likely that operators >> will have names requiring some sort of encoding than that objects with >> SQL-identifier names will. > > I'm not sure. The only character that's certainly an issue is "/". Are > there any others on file systems that we want to support?
\ and : if we care at all about windows.... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
