> From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] > On Behalf Of Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
> Please, stop arguing on all of this: I don't think that adding an > option will hurt anybody (specially because the work was already done > by someone), we are not asking to change how the things work, we just > want an option to decided whether we want it to freeze on standby > disconnection, or if we want it to continue automatically... is that > asking so much? I think this kind of decision should be done from outside utility or scripts. It would be better if from outside it can be detected that stand-by is down during sync replication, and send command to master to change its mode or change settings appropriately without stopping master. Putting this kind of more and more logic into replication code will make it more cumbersome. With Regards, Amit Kapila. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
