Is there a reason to vacuum the pgbench_* tables after the indexes on them are built, rather than before?
Since the indexes are on fresh tables, they can't have anything that needs to be cleaned. I don't think the current order accomplishes anything, except to slow down large initializations by ~25%. The attached patch moves the vacuums up. I also made -n skip the vacuums altogether. Since -n is allowed under -i, it would be nice if it did something, and there is only one intuitive thing for it to do. I don't know what the use case for is, but I think I've heard grumbling about it before. Cheers, Jeff
pgbench_vacuum_order_v1.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
