On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:26:16PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 14:17 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Yes, that would be a problem because the WAL records are deleted by > > pg_upgrade. Does a shutdown of the standby not already replay all WAL > > logs? > > There is no notion of "all WAL logs" because the WAL is infinite. Do you > mean "all WAL generated by the master before shutdown" or "all WAL that > the standby knows has been generated by the master so far"? > > Regardless, I don't think the standby attempts to do much after a > shutdown is requested.
Doesn't matter anymore --- I now know pg_upgrade has to be run on the standby, and it will be in primary mode and do full WAL reading before it starts. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
