On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 04:23:04PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > Yes, the list of rough edges is the 14-steps you have to perform to run > > pg_upgrade, as documented in the pg_upgrade manual page: > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/pgupgrade.html > > > > The unknown is how to reduce the number of steps in a way the community > > would find acceptable. > > I think this is one good idea: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/29806.1340655...@sss.pgh.pa.us > > The number of steps is an issue, but the likelihood of the actual > pg_upgrade run failing or doing the wrong thing is also something we > need to work on.
If we currently require 14 steps to use pg_upgrade, how would that reduce this number? What failures does it fix? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
