On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:34:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 09:00:11PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> On tor, 2011-08-04 at 14:44 +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: > >>> I meant a mass "sed -e 's/TRUE/true/g' -e 's/FALSE/false/g'" run > >>> so all the ~200 occurrences of both "TRUE" and "FALSE" get > >>> converted so the whole source tree is consistent. > > >> I would be in favor of that. > > > I have implemented this with the patch at: > > http://momjian.us/expire/true_diff.txt > > Does this really do anything for us that will justify the extra > back-patching pain it will cause? I don't see that it's improving > code readability any.
I think it is more of a consistency issue. There were multiple people who wanted this change. Of course, some of those people don't backport stuff. Other comments? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
