On 17/08/12 03:45, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:38:09AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
On 16.08.2012 17:49, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 16.08.2012 17:36, Bruce Momjian wrote:
In docs, change a few cases of "not important" to
"unimportant".
FWIW, I don't think these changes were an improvement. I find
"not important" more readable in those sentences.
+1
Really? All of them?
Yes.. Perhaps "not important" just feels better to me in general
than "unimportant".
Yeah, it's probably subjective, but for me "unimportant" has
negative, dismissive overtones, while "not important" does not.
Sort of like the way "unpleasant" has a different meaning than "not
pleasant".
OK, thanks for the feedback.
I feel the same way.
Even though 'logically' they have the same meaning, I think...
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
