> > If there is some syntax that offers a convenient shorthand for WHERE, > that's fine with me. Or using two tables, one called foo and one called > foo_history, is also fine. But I don't want the DML syntax to introduce > new mechanisms that aren't available without the fancy syntax (though > new DDL arrangements might be fine). >
convention foo_history is used often - and it should be significant break for migration Regards Pavel Stehule > Regards, > Jeff Davis > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
