Gavin Sherry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm thinking that temporary views should be pretty trivial to > implement.
... except not so trivial, per the rest of your note.
Do we actually need any such feature? Views on temp tables already work
correctly in CVS tip: the implicit DROP CASCADE on temp tables at
backend exit makes such views go 'way too.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
