* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Um ... I don't see any difference in the clause ordering from 8.2 > forward. "SELECT * FROM baz<TAB>" produces a query like this in 8.2:
Odd.. I could have sworn I saw a difference in the query generated, but perhaps I just assumed it was reordered, since it ends up ordered differently in the actual plans: 8.2: http://explain.depesz.com/s/449 9.1: http://explain.depesz.com/s/03O Increasing the cost of pg_table_is_visible() caused it to move that test to the end again (under 9.1), which improved the performance (though I'm sure having a usable index would help a great deal more..). Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature