Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > First, note the change in topic. > > This whole discussion has gone rather far afield from Miroslav's > original submission, which was for temporal tables, which is NOT > the same thing as audit logs, although the use cases overlap > significantly. I don't think the concerns I raised about apparent order of execution for serializable transactions apply to audit logs. If we've moved entirely off the topic of the original subject, it is a complete non-issue. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
