On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 01:01:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > AFAICT, the remote_write setting for synchronous_commit is named exactly > backwards, because the point of the setting is that it *doesn't* wait > for the remote to write anything. > > As an alternative I suggest "remote_receive". Perhaps somebody else > has a better idea?
Yes, I didn't like remote_write either; see this thread: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-05/msg00375.php Yes, please, I would like it changed. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers