Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: >> TBH I'd rather stick with the less invasive approach of the original patch >> at this stage, and see about refactoring for 9.3.
> +1. > While I haven't looked at the code specifically, these areas can be > quite fragile and very environment-dependent. I'd rather not upset it > this close to release - especially not after RC wrap. Fair enough. Will one of you deal with the patch as-is, then? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers