Magnus Hagander <> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Andrew Dunstan <> wrote:
>> TBH I'd rather stick with the less invasive approach of the original patch
>> at this stage, and see about refactoring for 9.3.

> +1.

> While I haven't looked at the code specifically, these areas can be
> quite fragile and very environment-dependent. I'd rather not upset it
> this close to release - especially not after RC wrap.

Fair enough.  Will one of you deal with the patch as-is, then?

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to