Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> With the new dependency system we have the entire system catalog content
> pinned down and unchangeable.  This is a tiny dent in the nice extensible
> nature of the system.
> 
> Would it be feasible to identify the non-essential parts of the built-in
> objects (say, inet type, numeric type, associated functions, etc.) and
> declare those with regular SQL commands in initdb?  In the end, the system
> catalog contents in include/catalog/ would only contain the "bootstrap"
> content.  For example, the pg_proc content could be made more manageable
> that way.
> 
> Not sure if this is worth considering for this release, but it might be a
> medium-term project.

Uh, some tools rely on those oids being fixed values, don't they?  For
example, I see ecpg using NUMERICOID.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to