On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:26:30PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > So a patch of 1K lines would by itself represent about 2% of the typical > > inter-branch delta. Maybe that's below our threshold of pain, or maybe > > it isn't. I'd be happier about it if there were a more compelling > > argument for it, but to me it looks like extremely trivial neatnik-ism. > > I wouldn't mind a bit if we devoted 2% of our inter-branch deltas to > this sort of thing, but I've got to admit that 2% for one patch seems > a little on the high side to me. It might not be a bad idea to > establish one formulation or the other as the one to be used in all > new code, though, to avoid making the problem worse.
Patch withdrawn. If we ever do a major code churn, it might be good to revisit this cleanup. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
