Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Maybe, to reduce future backpatching pain, we could backpatch the change
> to exec_prog() API now that you have fixed the implementation?
I'm inclined to think this is a good idea, but keep in mind we're less
than four days from wrapping 9.2.0. There's not a lot of margin for
error here.
At the same time, getting pg_upgrade to pass regression on Windows would
be a good thing, and ought to go a long way towards ameliorating worries
about this.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
